CritABCD
MYP Guides/Biology/Criterion C
MYP SCIENCES · OUT OF 8

MYP Biology Criterion C: Processing and evaluating

Criterion C asks you to handle data from living systems honestly: show it clearly, describe what it says, and be careful about how much one set of results can prove.

WHAT THE STRANDS ASK

C.i
Present collected and transformed data

Clear tables and graphs with units, labels and any calculations shown.

C.ii
Interpret data and describe results

You describe the pattern with numbers and explain it using science.

C.iii
Discuss the validity of the hypothesis

You say whether the evidence supports your hypothesis and how far.

C.iv
Discuss the validity of the method

You link specific weaknesses in the method to their effect on the results.

C.v
Describe improvements or extensions

Realistic changes that would fix the weaknesses you found, or the next question to test.

WHAT EACH SCORE LEVEL TENDS TO LOOK LIKE

1-2
LIMITED

A little of the criterion is addressed. Ideas are basic, partly missing, or not linked to the task.

3-4
ADEQUATE

The main points are there but thin. Some explanations are correct; links to the task or evidence are incomplete.

5-6
SUBSTANTIAL

Mostly accurate, well explained and consistently tied to the task, with only small gaps.

7-8
EXCELLENT

Detailed, precise and justified throughout, with ideas connected and applied to new situations or evidence.

A plain-language guide only. Your teacher marks against the official IB level descriptors.

HOW TO SCORE HIGHER

  • Calculate a mean for repeats and show how, and consider ranges to show spread.
  • Draw graphs with the independent variable on the x-axis, labelled with units.
  • Describe the pattern with numbers and then explain it with biology.
  • Evaluate with sample size and variation in mind: how many organisms did you test?

COMMON MISTAKES

  • Concluding a cause from only one repeat.
  • Explaining a result by saying it was because of the experiment.
  • Leaving anomalous results in the mean without comment.

WORKED EXAMPLE: WEAK VERSUS STRONG

Evaluate an enzyme investigation in which the rate of reaction was measured at five temperatures.

WEAK

The results were not very good. We could do it again.

STRONG

The results at 60 °C showed one anomalous reading (rate 3.2 compared with 0.4 and 0.5), which I excluded after noting it probably came from a delay in starting the timer. Only three repeats per temperature were taken, so the mean may not represent the true rate. Taking five repeats and using a water bath with a thermometer would give more reliable data about where the optimum lies.

WHY THE STRONG ANSWER WORKS
  • It identifies the anomaly and handles it explicitly.
  • It links the small sample to reliability.
  • The improvements are specific and fix the weaknesses.

TRY IT: FREE SAMPLE QUESTIONS

All free sample questions →

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is MYP Biology Criterion C?⌄

Criterion C is Processing and evaluating. It is marked out of 8 across 5 strands (C.i, C.ii, C.iii, C.iv, C.v). Criterion C asks you to handle data from living systems honestly: show it clearly, describe what it says, and be careful about how much one set of results can prove.

How do I score highly in MYP Biology Criterion C?⌄

Calculate a mean for repeats and show how, and consider ranges to show spread. Draw graphs with the independent variable on the x-axis, labelled with units. Describe the pattern with numbers and then explain it with biology.

What are common mistakes in MYP Biology Criterion C?⌄

Concluding a cause from only one repeat. Explaining a result by saying it was because of the experiment. Leaving anomalous results in the mean without comment.

Practise Criterion C for real
Past papers and live classes on CritABCD, marked against the A–D criteria.
Practise MYP Biology →

Written by CritABCD for study and revision, in our own words. The official MYP Biology guide and assessment criteria are published by the International Baccalaureate. Official IB guide ↗